https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/bc1qekvmkczge3hxrvwdf2lj3yyvgjnparn3fdf9lg

Incoming contributions:

- #1, reward address: 17P3kGxqCm45b5QQhBo1VhrG9FzKqyVyvv
  - txid: 9ed083fa57c2c7a03123f1d21c86daa96e44e3d88f0f73e1784429769a5c4ab7
  - current profit share: 10% (donation made: 0.00276677 BTC ~ 200 usd)
  - origin: anonymous
  - bids: none
  - early-bird: yes
  - sponsor: no
  - partner: no
  - dev: no
  - sepa: no
  - grant: no
  - refunded: no
  - comment: no
  - date: 5/26/2026
  - spent: yes, 6/17/2026

- #2, reward address: bc1q2ds62dp3647w74xr9njkwze2mhl0cp0uge75tv
  - txid: 01fca3a26dabe372972e0d5bac93f8dd108032a1070e6e2f72d22c20d0b473af
  - current profit share: 90% (donation made: 0.00276677 BTC ~ 1750 usd)
  - origin: anonymous
  - bids: 
    - preferred: audit tool UX refinements
      - signed: no 
      - comment: from trusted anonymous partner, coinbase wallet
  - profit-share: refused by partner, but enforced
    - note: profit share will go back to coinbase, strict rule: alterations not accepted
  - early-bird: yes
  - sponsor: no
  - partner: yes
  - dev: no
  - sepa: no
  - grant: no
  - refunded: no 
    - note: refund from the founder still keeps you in the pool, pool speculations by the founder not accepted
      - explanation: otherwise the founder would be able to artificially inflate partner's share in the pool by refunding the rest of participants (in situations when profits are much higher than initial investments)
      - note: since refunds keep in the profit share pool (which can be exploited) - refunds are on founder's discretion (will be reported here for public fund audit).
        - note: as a result - bids can be anonymous, but content of the bid (feature requested) cannot be private
  - date: 6/19/2026
  - spent: partially
  - comment: partner is learning the concept of self-custody :) and preparing more donations to send.

Current fund pledge: 0 BTC
- comment on donation #2: founder is learning to not use Ledger Live, but Electrum (with Ledger plugin) instead to keep some pledge in the fund.
  - keeping some pledge is preferred to avoid artificial inflation of the pool (whole pool or a group of participants) by the founder himself
  - pledge also incentivises development, since fund's wallet is on Ledger Nano, the device that is meant to be defended by the project

Current outstanding dev fund: ~ 900 USD
- comment: small bids might be prioritized to keep spendings dynamic, and depending on relevance
  - pending compensations might be de-prioritized to small bids and higher priority features (on discretion)

Team:
- dk14 (founder, lead)
- dk14, on behalf of John Doe (dev)

Spendings:
- dk14, website: 3+9 hours logged (150 USD donation#1)
    - intro, front and official page
- dk14, audit-tool: 1 hour logged + 7 hours logged (50 USD donation#1, 350 USD donation#2)
    - avalanche model integration
    - ring-oscillators prototype
    - (from pending): refinements/improvements, manual testing

PR reward spendings:
 - none

Pending compensations (as of Jun 17 2026):
- dk14, website refinements: 20 hours logged (1,000 USD)
    - intro, front and official page
- dk14, audit tool PoC: 160 - 7 hours logged (8,000 - 350 USD)
    - chats, coding, analysis, refinements/improvements, manual testing, ensuring non-exploitability, documenting
- dk14, documented research efforts: 800 hours logged (at risk, 40,000 USD)
  - github:dk14/crypto root: (no AI-assistance) flaws related to non-monotonicty, DLP, number theory, polynomials, transfers.
  - github:dk14/crypto/chats: long formal chats with AI about number theory, related abstract math and physics

--------
--------
--------
**Semi-formal pre-history of the project.**

> Note: semi-automated verification of many activities described below requires running AI with high (above consumer level) access to computational resources and government internal databases (e.g. immigration records, military records, reports). It also requires AI clean from speculative reasoning and "fill-in" hallucinations, not consumer-grade AI.
>> The section is added to fund tracking because of practical alternative: when Explorer Network is operational, it can demonstrate certain zero-balance keys hacked after funds are safely moved away. Owners of the keys would get private individual proofs and will, thus, be incetivized to reward the network and the profit-share downstream. Since massive activities would be noticable on-chain, and corresponding TRNG replica code would be auditable, dev fund share can be adjusted in relation to amount of funds saved to fit high-value compensations.

High-value activities compensations pending (as of 2026):
- dk14, independent field research at physical risk (government security research: agencies, police departments, detention centers, refugee centers, military conflict borderline zones; + science/inventions depend on quality of agriculture, so, agricultural security research: travel expenses, financial risks), >1,000,000 USD, spans over past 5 years
- dk14, novel practical approach for actual true entropy, >10,000,000 USD, spans over last decade
  - research done on rejecting quantum randomness/computing: github:dk14/q, github:dk14/fqc
  - research done on Digital Signal Processing and HCI: dk14/warriors
    - note: Human Computer Interaction research was related to human factor in security, human entropy is low (both "mind and body").
  - research done into Bitcoin PoW and SHA256 specifics (eg SHA256's dangerous reducibility to SAT)
  - research done into computability, its relation to conservation laws;
    - result: successful projection into cryptography: assymetric and symmetric (dk14/crypto root README)
  - overall scientific research: e.g. rejection of "infinite objects" in CS and cryptography.
    - impact: results allow to pragmatically discard claims not backed up by inductive proofs
  - historical research of NIST/FED legacy: project-related bitcointalks mention
  - active research into macroeconomics, ecology
  - results: developed working formalism, practically applicable definition of randomness/entropy, grounded in physics
    - impact: developed protocol for real-world implementation
  - unique insights and expirience, risks taken (going against academia)
  - field research and criminological analysis: shady investment banking, shady IT projects in Cardano ecosystem, shady freelance, shady research orgs
  - penalties for institutional, enforcement, academic and social resistance to independent scientific research (and human natural and legal rights): TBD
  - benefits of research - saves trillions of USD.
    - saves natural resources, if applied cross-discipline: efficiency of consumption maximizes util entropy.


